Logo of LLMC Digital present on all screens.  Clicking here will always return to Homepage
A 501 (c)(3) nonprofit committed to ‘saving the law’
prd server 2Book Bag
Description and Holding Information
Elling, Comparative analysis of guilty plea inquiries in federal civilian and military practice, 1991
A Comparative Analysis of Guilty Plea Inquiries in Federal Civilian and Military Practice: A Thesis Presented to the Judge Advocate General’s School,
U.S. Army, by Major Terry L. Elling, JA. 39th Judge Advocate Officer Graduate Course (April 1991). [Published 134 Mil. L. Rev. 195 (1991).]
Approximately 140 p., variously paginated. The typewritten manuscript contains the main text in four sections including introduction and conclusion; endnote;
and 3 appendices, including Rule 910 from Rules for Courts-Martial, and Proposed Revisions to Article 45(a), UCMJ, and R.C.M. 910. (From the abstract:
“This thesis compares the guilty pleas providence inquiry at courts-martial with the guilty plea inquiry in Federal district courts. [It] offers a
history of the recent evolution of both practices [and] an analysis of similarities and differences.”)
Title:   A comparative analysis of guilty plea inquiries in federal civilian and military practice / by Major Terry L. Elling, JA, United States Army.
OCLC Number:   1291367711
Available Volumes
NameFiche CountOnlinePaper Backup
Vol. 1YesNo